I reckon Tim made me laugh to some degree quite literally at least 150 times, maybe 200, and many of the gags could have made me laugh for far longer had Tim's style not conditioned the audience to stop laughing quickly so you can recover and prepare for the next onslaught. Some of the parts that got the biggest laughs came in the encore where Tim let drunken people in the audience make prats of themselves and he didn't need to do anything himself. I give the show 9½/10 at least and recommend it to any fan of wordplay, puns or silliness. (On the downside, the support act was
2) Giving people your LJ password not only compromises the integrity of your non-public entries, it compromises the integrity of anyone who chooses to share their non-public entries with you, especially if you view these non-public entries through your Friends list. The only person I ever told my LJ password to was heidi8, once, but then I changed it. Changing your LJ password frequently is a good thing.
Giving people your LJ password means that, if they want to, they can do any or all of: delete all your entries to date, retrospectively post entries in your name, post comments in your name, spread mistruths and - not to put too fine a point on it - commit crimes (such as ones pertaining to copyright infringements and/or illegal pornography) in your name. Most people wouldn't do that if they got your password. Some might, though, and asking for my password tends to make me assume the worst about you.
Making people's non-public entries public is reprehensible. On the other hand, there are very many tools to do so already, without there needing to be hysteria over any particular new tool which might happen to make this technique particularly easy. Part of the reason why the LJsphere is so wonderful is the openness and extensibility that LJ offers; I wouldn't want to restrict that openness and extensibility just because some of the applications that take advantage of it happen to be malicious. The challenge is to derive benign applications from malicious concepts. (If anything, it's surprising and heartening that there aren't famous trash-someone's-LJ-if-you-know-their-pas
Besides, it's not as if the rules of etiquette aren't bent a little at times without any especial tools already, when the stakes are sufficiently high and/or the target is a sufficiently juicy and/or tempting one, or the etiquette-bender simply doesn't care about their reputation...
3) Are there ever discussions about (optionally) beefing up LJ security so that an attacker who knows your password cannot trash your LJ? I'm no security expert - in fact, it'll probably be immediately obvious that I don't know what I'm on about here - but I'm thinking idly about some sort of password-and-one-time-pad challenge-and-response series operation here. At one level, hey, it's only LJ, but, you know, LJ is non-specifically important.
4) Idea for an lj_nifty tool: LJKibo. Enter a term, and LJKibo generates a feed of all public posts to LJ mentioning the specified term. This should actually be easy to write, though I fear computationally very expensive to run - just filter the latest posts feed for the search term of your choice. I wouldn't be surprised if a version of this tool is being used already on a certain ten-letter name that I have no wish to mention in my post.